RADar-AZDelta/archived-Rabbit-in-a-Blender
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/RADar-AZDelta/Rabbit-in-a-Blender.git synced 2026-03-23 20:37:03 +00:00
Code Issues 6 Projects Packages Wiki Activity

[GH-ISSUE #31] RIAB: Performance RiAB & cost #13

New issue
Closed
opened 2026-03-23 20:28:32 +00:00 by mirror · 1 comment
mirror commented 2026-03-23 20:28:32 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Originally created by @kdenturc on GitHub (Feb 28, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/RADar-AZDelta/Rabbit-in-a-Blender/issues/31

Originally assigned to: @pjlammertyn on GitHub.

@pjlammertyn running RiAB on measurement table alone has taken runtime approximate 15 to 20 minutes and at the end the cost went up to 10EUR, so today I've spent over 100EUR.
How can we optimize?

If I took the labo_usagi_csv file and diminished the rows from 6500 till 70, then runtime went to 3 minutes and cost was 0.91EUR
which is funner to work with.

Would it be an idea for performance and cost that we delete unchecked and flagged mappings? how can we do so?

tx!
please follow @sieldep

Originally created by @kdenturc on GitHub (Feb 28, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/RADar-AZDelta/Rabbit-in-a-Blender/issues/31 Originally assigned to: @pjlammertyn on GitHub. @pjlammertyn running RiAB on measurement table alone has taken runtime approximate 15 to 20 minutes and at the end the cost went up to 10EUR, so today I've spent over 100EUR. How can we optimize? If I took the labo_usagi_csv file and diminished the rows from 6500 till 70, then runtime went to 3 minutes and cost was 0.91EUR which is funner to work with. Would it be an idea for performance and cost that we delete unchecked and flagged mappings? how can we do so? tx! please follow @sieldep
mirror 2026-03-23 20:28:32 +00:00
mirror commented 2026-03-23 20:28:33 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

@sieldep commented on GitHub (Feb 28, 2024):

De usagi files voor mzg diagnoses zijn bijvoorbeeld ook heel groot. Eventueel ook filteren op wanneer sourceFrequency 0 is? Dat deze niet in de usagi blijven staan?

<!-- gh-comment-id:1969328393 --> @sieldep commented on GitHub (Feb 28, 2024): De usagi files voor mzg diagnoses zijn bijvoorbeeld ook heel groot. Eventueel ook filteren op wanneer sourceFrequency 0 is? Dat deze niet in de usagi blijven staan?
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
Branches Tags
main
109-episode_event-table-not-filled
issue95-make-link-between-episode_parent_id-and-episode_id
dependabot/pip/requests-2.32.0
gh-pages
0.0.74
0.0.73
0.0.72
0.0.71
0.0.70
0.0.69
0.0.68
0.0.67
0.0.66
0.0.65
0.0.64
0.0.63
0.0.62
0.0.61
0.0.60
0.0.59
0.0.58
0.0.57
0.0.56
0.0.54
0.0.53
0.0.52
0.0.51
0.0.50
0.0.48
0.0.47
0.0.45
0.0.44
0.0.42
0.0.40
0.0.39
0.0.38
0.0.37
0.0.36
0.0.35
0.0.34
Labels
Clear labels   
bug

   
cannot reproduce

   
duplicate

   
enhancement

   
experiment

   
invalid

   
pull-request

Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request

  
question

   
wontfix
No labels
bug
cannot reproduce
duplicate
enhancement
experiment
invalid
pull-request
question
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
RADar-AZDelta/archived-Rabbit-in-a-Blender#13
No description provided.