mirror of
https://github.com/tubearchivist/browser-extension.git
synced 2026-03-23 20:37:07 +00:00
[GH-ISSUE #43] Extension stopped working after update to TubeArchivist v0.4.10 #27
Labels
No labels
bug
bug
duplicate
enhancement
help wanted
invalid
not an issue
not an issue
pull-request
question
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
tubearchivist/archived-browser-extension#27
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @ewoks on GitHub (Aug 4, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/tubearchivist/browser-extension/issues/43
Not sure if there is some breaking change after last TubeArchivist (v0.4.10) update, but it's extension v0.3.2 stopped working and shows "Can't connect to server".
Going directly to the url
http://<local-ip>:8888/api/ping/answers with HTTP 200, pong and version, but extension can't make it.Please see attached screenshot of extension's worker

I would like to emphasize this worked without issues for weeks before last update.
@bbilly1 please let me know if I can/should do some other debugging/logging that would be helpful.
@bbilly1 commented on GitHub (Aug 6, 2024):
There were no changes in v0.4.10, that was only a bump for yt-dlp. So if there were any changes, it was on your end.
You can get more logs and return statements by inspecting the background process, see Readme.
@ewoks commented on GitHub (Aug 6, 2024):
Thanks for the comment @bbilly1 but there is nothing in the Readme about logs or background process besides what I already showed on the screenshot above. Could you please be a bit more specific. I didn't make any change, but for some reason extension can't connect to the service any more rendering errors:

@bbilly1 commented on GitHub (Aug 6, 2024):
Please don't @ people, that creates unnecessary spam. Go to the Readme and search for background.js.
@ewoks commented on GitHub (Aug 6, 2024):
I understand you are doing this for free and appreciate effort, didn't want to push, but I believe I was asking in a kind and polite way for the hint.
This attitude comes from you pretty often lately and I hope whatever bothers you it goes away and wish you get well soon.
@bbilly1 commented on GitHub (Aug 6, 2024):
Let's stop here.