AppFlowy-IO/AppFlowy

Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/AppFlowy-IO/AppFlowy.git synced 2026-03-24 04:46:56 +00:00

[GH-ISSUE #4430] [Bug] Where is appflowy_0.4.3_windows-x86_64.zip? #1981

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-03-23 21:18:42 +00:00 by mirror · 6 comments

mirror commented

2026-03-23 21:18:42 +00:00

Owner

Originally created by @Twilightssuperb on GitHub (Jan 20, 2024).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/AppFlowy-IO/AppFlowy/issues/4430

Bug Description

I see commit that 0.4.2 ZIP-files have been retracted, but now 0.4.3_macos-universal.zip is available. What about Windows ZIP-version?

How to Reproduce

See above.

Expected Behavior

Find Windows ZIP-version on releases page.

Operating System

Win 8.1 x64

AppFlowy Version(s)

0.4.1 (x64-86 ZIP-version from Github)

Screenshots

No response

Additional Context

No response

Originally created by @Twilightssuperb on GitHub (Jan 20, 2024). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/AppFlowy-IO/AppFlowy/issues/4430 ### Bug Description I see [commit](https://github.com/AppFlowy-IO/AppFlowy/commit/f612d9b7017ac445057efa680722456d01013e78) that 0.4.2 ZIP-files have been retracted, but now `0.4.3_macos-universal.zip` is available. What about Windows ZIP-version? ### How to Reproduce See above. ### Expected Behavior Find Windows ZIP-version on releases page. ### Operating System Win 8.1 x64 ### AppFlowy Version(s) 0.4.1 (x64-86 ZIP-version from Github) ### Screenshots _No response_ ### Additional Context _No response_

mirror closed this issue

2026-03-23 21:18:42 +00:00

mirror commented

2026-03-23 21:18:43 +00:00

Author

Owner

@appflowy commented on GitHub (Jan 20, 2024):

Hi @Twilightssuperb

The issue with the Windows application causing the login callback to fail appears to be related to running the application directly after unzipping it from the zip file, without a formal installation process. This method of execution means the application is not registered with the system to handle deep links, as the custom URI schemes required for deep linking are not registered in the system's registry. We are actively working to resolve this issue.

@appflowy commented on GitHub (Jan 20, 2024): Hi @Twilightssuperb The issue with the Windows application causing the login callback to fail appears to be related to running the application directly after unzipping it from the zip file, without a formal installation process. This method of execution means the application is not registered with the system to handle deep links, as the custom URI schemes required for deep linking are not registered in the system's registry. We are actively working to resolve this issue.

mirror commented

2026-03-23 21:18:43 +00:00

Author

Owner

@Xelbayria commented on GitHub (Jan 21, 2024):

I created a similar issue #4422

Edit:
I'll close the issue. since the title is better self-explanatory.

@Xelbayria commented on GitHub (Jan 21, 2024): I created a similar issue #4422 Edit: I'll close the issue. since the title is better self-explanatory.

mirror commented

2026-03-23 21:18:43 +00:00

Author

Owner

@Twilightssuperb commented on GitHub (Jan 21, 2024):

@Xelbayria, could you tell, does your PR propose another method of making portable app, not that was used before this case with 0.4.2? Or should I don't care, it doesn't matter for me as user?

@Twilightssuperb commented on GitHub (Jan 21, 2024): @Xelbayria, could you tell, does your PR propose another method of making portable app, not that was used before this case with 0.4.2? Or should I don't care, it doesn't matter for me as user?

mirror commented

2026-03-23 21:18:43 +00:00

Author

Owner

@LucasXu0 commented on GitHub (Jan 21, 2024):

Hey, @Xelbayria @Twilightssuperb. I have uploaded the Windows package in ZIP format.

@LucasXu0 commented on GitHub (Jan 21, 2024): Hey, @Xelbayria @Twilightssuperb. I have uploaded the Windows package in ZIP format.

mirror commented

2026-03-23 21:18:44 +00:00

Author

Owner

@Xelbayria commented on GitHub (Jan 21, 2024):

@Xelbayria, could you tell, does your PR propose another method of making portable app, not that was used before this case with 0.4.2? Or should I don't care, it doesn't matter for me as user?

I'm not understanding your question? can you clarify

@Xelbayria commented on GitHub (Jan 21, 2024): > @Xelbayria, could you tell, does your PR propose another method of making portable app, not that was used before this case with 0.4.2? Or should I don't care, it doesn't matter for me as user? I'm not understanding your question? can you clarify

mirror commented

2026-03-23 21:18:44 +00:00

Author

Owner

@Twilightssuperb commented on GitHub (Jan 21, 2024):

It doesn't matter now. 😁 ZIP-file is finally available again.

@Twilightssuperb commented on GitHub (Jan 21, 2024): It doesn't matter now. 😁 ZIP-file is finally available again.

mirror referenced this issue

2026-03-23 22:16:58 +00:00

[PR #1981] [MERGED] Improvement for cover plugin #1928 #5047